A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is a person who engages in labor.

On 21:30 on 07. 07. 07. 21:21:30, the Defendant was subject to a police officer E belonging to the Dongdaemun-gu Police Station D District Unit of the Dongdaemun-gu Police Station called the Defendant, who was under the influence of a disturbance on the road under the influence of alcohol on the front side of the “Cmat” in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul.

The Defendant, at the time, fighting with F’s body and fighting with the reporter, and heard statements from F on the 112 reporter report details, etc., the Defendant interfered with legitimate performance of public duties in accordance with the police officer’s 112 report, including, but not limited to, her flick, she left the police flick. Chewing flick with the driver’s flick, and her flick with the driver’s flick with his flick, “whether it is necessary to flick and flickly flick with the tax to be paid to him,” and “the flick and flick with the tax to be taken at home,” and obstructed the police officer’s performance of public duties in accordance with the 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the suspended execution is above the fact that the defendant repents his mistake, appears to be a contingent crime committed under the influence of alcohol, and the defendant does not have the same criminal history and has no criminal history exceeding the fine, etc.