The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The defendant asserts that, on the grounds of the appeal of this case, the punishment of the court below against the defendant (ten months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of social service work, 120 hours) is too unreasonable.

In this case, the defendant's mistake is seriously against the defendant, and there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and the profits from the crime of this case are not high. However, even though the defendant's entrustment with the Mina business place, the crime of this case's crime is not less complicated for each crime of this case to arrange the employment of Thai women who enter the Republic of Korea for illegal employment.

In full view of all the above circumstances, the sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable because it goes beyond the reasonable scope of discretion and is not unreasonable, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the background and method of each of the crimes in this case; (b) the motive and motive of the crime; (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, career, home environment, record of punishment, etc.; and (d) the overall circumstances, which form the conditions for sentencing

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to appeal.