logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.06.04 2015고단2169
출입국관리법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall arrange or solicit the employment of any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

Nevertheless, around August 20, 2014, the Defendant arranged employment of 23 foreign workers who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking as described in the attached list of crimes from December 2013 to December 2014, 2014, by introducing to E the G (B-1) of the nationality of the Thailand who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities by entering the same as the status of visa exemption (B-1) upon the request of E at the business establishment where Non-Indicted 102-1 of the "F" of the operation of the building 1002-1 of the Dong-dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City D building 102-1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Each police statement of E and H;

1. Each decision on examining an immigration offender, and a statement of employment of a crackdown foreigner;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the sojourn and scope of activities of foreigners, the amount received for arrangement of employment by a solar nation of A paid by E, 19 solar countries employed and mediated by A, and analysis of details of A transactions);

1. Article 94 Subparag. 10 of the Immigration Control Act and Articles 18(4) of the same Act, the choice of punishment for an offense, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is as follows: (a) in that the Defendant has arranged the employment of the pregnant women who enter the Republic of Korea for illegal employment from the beginning; (b) is not bad; (c) the Defendant is divided into each other; and (d) the Defendant has no record of committing the same kind of crime; and (c) the Defendant appears to have no record of committing the instant crime; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive and consequence of the instant crime; and (e) the number of

arrow