Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The facts charged are rhyd.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of B 125cc.

On December 19, 2019, the Defendant driven the above Obaon on December 12:45, 2019, and transferred the intersection of D charging station in front of the filling station in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C from the front side of the Plaintiff at the right side of the Plaintiff.

Since the above intersection has a crosswalk installed, the defendant, who is engaged in driving on the off-to-land, was obligated to protect pedestrians, such as temporarily stopping in front of the crosswalk, by examining whether the pedestrian is traveling along the crosswalk.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, caused the injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. that requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the left side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the pedestrian crossing, by shocking the left side of the victim E (the age of 46) according to the pedestrian signals.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A traffic accident report, vehicle photograph, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is deemed that the reasoning for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is covered by a comprehensive insurance, and that the degree of injury to the victim is not much severe, and that the previous crime of this case is the first crime without any criminal power, etc., but it is deemed that the amount of negligence of this case, which shocked the victim walking the crosswalk, seems to have been disadvantageous to the defendant at the time of the accident, such as that the victim’s sound slicking and slicking, etc. is difficult.