logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2021.03.25 2020고단2320
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On August 11, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on August 19, 2020 by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Special Act on the Prevention of Insurance Fraud in the Seo-gu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BRUISM300 Oral Ba in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury)

On June 12, 2020, the Defendant driven an over-to-face 20:41 on June 12, 2020, and led the Defendant to turn to the left at a speed that cannot be known from the 1 lane of the red signals of the vehicle to the intersection of three-lanes in front of Daegu-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City).

At night, there are crosswalks where signal, etc. is installed at the intersection, so in such cases, there was a duty of care to reduce speed to the person engaged in driving on the off-to-land and to ensure the right and the right and the right and the right of the person, to check whether there is any person, and to observe the signal, to prevent the accident in advance by driving the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not discover the victim D (the remaining and the age of 62) who opened the way from the right side of the crosswalk to the left side by using the crosswalk pursuant to the pedestrian signals due to the negligence of driving in violation of the signal, and received the parts adjacent to the victim's driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as dysium, pelvis, and syke part of the need for medical treatment for about two weeks due to occupational negligence as above.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a holder of a two-wheeled automobile, BRUS YM300.

No person shall operate any motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated a two-wheeled automobile that was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's oral statement;

arrow