beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding ten thousand won.
Seized evidence 1 or 2 shall be confiscated.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From January 2014 to October 2014, the Defendant is operating a marina business in the name of “D” with five massage rooms, shower rooms, multi-purpose rooms, and a setter on the fourth floor of the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building.
Around 22:00 on October 7, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 90,000 from E and paid KRW 45,000 to F employed by the Defendant, and F had F engage in the act of similarity in a way of sprinking the e telegraph and sprinking the sexual organ in hand, and then had F engage in the act of similarity in a way of sprinking the sexual organ below.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police interrogation protocol of F and E;
1. Articles 19 (2) 1 and 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [Scope of Recommendation] is that there is no person who is a special person] in the basic area (six to one year and four months), such as arranging sexual traffic, etc. in the sexual traffic crimes of 19 years of age or older. [Judgment of sentence] The defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million at the Seoul Southern District Court on January 5, 2007 as a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic; on December 27, 2007, the defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million as a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic; on April 23, 2009, the Seoul Southern District Court was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment as a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic; and on June 26, 2009, the Seoul Southern District Court was punished by a fine of KRW 100,500.
Nevertheless, the defendant repeats the same crime, the circumstances after the crime, and the perception and attitude in the court that seems to disregard the law.