logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.10.21 2015고단1140
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a mutual business with the trade name “D” in Jeju City.

From May 1, 2015 to June 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) provided four rooms in “D” located in Jeju City with shower facilities in “D; (b) employed female employees; (c) received 130,000 won in cash per time from many unspecified male descendants; and (d) assisted female employees and sexual intercourse, thereby engaging in commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A E-document;

1. A report on the control of public morals;

1. Investigation report (Calculation of profits from the sexual traffic);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing guidelines of the latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic for the purpose of sentencing [the range of recommendations, sentences [the sexual traffic crime group, the sexual traffic crime subject to 19 years of age or older, the sexual traffic brokerage, etc., the second type (the brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic by giving and receiving compensation for business), the basic area, six months to 14 months] and the following circumstances are considered: The facts of the crime are recognized and the circumstances that are favorable to the determination of the punishment as stated in the order are against the law; the current situation where the business of this case was closed down; there was a history of having been a disposition of suspension of indictment for the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic on August 31, 201; from February 30, 2010 to October 30, 2014, after continuously receiving a summary order of a fine of KRW 500,000,000,000 from the business of this case for the same business of this case;

arrow