(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.04.18 2018구합852

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.04.18 2018구합852

2018년 사립학교 교감 자격연수 선정 제외 처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. B High schools are private schools operated by school juristic persons C (hereinafter “C”).

B. On March 1, 1985, the Plaintiff was appointed as the instant school teacher and served. On July 24, 2015, the Plaintiff was released from the Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office on the following charges of indecent act by compulsion, and was subject to disciplinary action against C on April 29, 2016.

The Plaintiff is the relationship between the victim D (n, 50 years of age) and the lessor and the lessee, and the victim operated the “Fnoman bank” on the first floor of the Gwangju Mine-gu E-gu, the Plaintiff owned.

On January 16, 2015, around 00:00 to 01:30 on the same day, the victim’s macks down the right side of the victim who was sitting on the right side of the studio No. 3, and commits an indecent act by opening the buckbucks on the right side of the victim’s port side, and then, the bucks, which read, “packer shall not receive any premium,” and the victim’s macks, rhumd the victim’s mack.

B. Around 00:40 on March 25, 2015, around 00:0:40, the victim’s arms were pottered in front of the instant singing machines, and then pottered against the victim, such as talking on the part of the female or kising on the part of the female.

C. On October 23, 2017, the Defendant sent to the instant school a letter of merit “to recommend persons subject to qualification training for the principal of a private school and qualification examination for the principal of a private school even in the year 2018.” On November 27, 2017, the principal of the instant school recommended the Plaintiff as qualified trainees. On December 4, 2017, the Defendant requested the instant school to review the recommendation of qualified trainees on the ground of the Plaintiff’s disciplinary power, etc., and C held a meeting of the board of directors on December 19, 2017, and decided again to recommend the Plaintiff to undergo qualification examination for the assistant principal of a private school. D. The Defendant, on December 28, 2017, notified the instant school of the following matters:

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2018.06.14 2017구합70923

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2021.04.22 2019가단123067

-전주지방법원 2021.04.08 2020구합1589

-서울행정법원 2019.06.13 2018구합74495

-수원지방법원 2018.05.03 2017구합69374