logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.17 2016나2024008
공사대금
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendants.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the instant case is as follows, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for modification and addition as follows.

Following the third 17th 17th son of the judgment of the court of first instance, “The defendant also claims that the confession was revoked because the confession was made by deception of the plaintiff, or that the document submitted on April 10, 2015, which stated the purport of the confession, was prepared and submitted without the consent of the defendants by the plaintiff, but it is not sufficient to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and in the first tier trial, there is no other evidence to recognize it as having been prepared by the defendants himself (the defendants as of August 19, 2015 and the briefs as of October 13, 2015).”

On the 3rd page of the first instance judgment, the Defendant added “The Defendant’s assertion that he succeeded to the obligation for the construction price to G and H, the owner of a newly constructed site and a building and a provisional registration right holder, or that the Plaintiff renounced the claim for the construction price against the Defendants, shall not accept the said assertion on the grounds that there is no evidence to acknowledge it.”

2. The judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and all appeals by the Defendants are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow