logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.02.01 2017나2055733
부당이득반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. This part of the basic facts is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the modification and addition as follows, since the reasoning of the first instance judgment is the same as that of Paragraph 1.

3 pages of the first instance judgment

C. 1) The following is added to 3.0 : “The 2.01 construction cost of the instant redevelopment project was 0.3 billion won and 2.5 billion won and the reconstruction project was implemented around June 2003; and the Plaintiff was established on May 12, 2006. The Plaintiff’s members appointed the Defendant as the contractor at the time of the reconstruction project as the contractor and confirmed the unit price of the instant redevelopment project as 19 to 21.6 billion won and 20.3 billion won each of the instant construction projects was 30.6 billion won and 10.6 billion won and 20.6 billion won each of the construction cost of the instant projects (=30.6 billion won and 20.6 billion won each of the instant construction cost of the instant projects). The Plaintiff completed the construction cost of 10.3 billion won and 10.6 billion won each of the instant construction work cost of the instant case, 200 Won and 20.8 billion won each of the instant construction cost of the instant construction project, 2010.6 billion won and 28.6.1.8

[2] As related to the third construction project of this case, the above amount seems to be the amount paid (including delay damages) by Tae-to-land against the plaintiff according to the result of the lawsuit filed against the plaintiff (Article 27 of this case) (Article 27 of this case).

[2] Each payment made by Eul

2. The Parties.

arrow