Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 8, 2017, at around 06:00, the Defendant damaged the property by destroying one copy of a glass window on the repair cost (100cm wide, 140cm long, 140cm wide) with the windows on the third floor of the above house in which the Defendant was living in Suwon-gu B and the victim C (n, 70cm) and the victim C (n, 15cm wide, 10cm wide).

2. 협박의 점 피고인은, 2017. 10. 8. 21:20 경 부산 수영구 B, 피해자 D( 남 ,77 세) 의 집 1 층 대문 앞에서 피해자가 마침 대문을 닫으러 내려오자 피해자에게 접근하여 “ 어이 영감쟁이. 불은 만다고 비추요 유리창 내가 깼소

And if you report, you will report.

Hawk's Republic of Korea has been police

The body of " shall be probed and threatened," and "the aged and fested by these presidents."

The land is buried in the land with a monak.

It is necessary to ask us with the broad inside of Korea.

The aging and kidle caused the aging and aging. The E Habaly sending it to the Republic of Korea. It notified the victim of the harm and injury that the Mabaly Mabalom, which is integrated into the Gu stone, is called the ground, “The Gu stone,” thereby threatening the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports (statements of intimidation damage and CCTV recording and analysis, etc.), and photographs damaged by glass windows;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 283 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for negligence;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) seems to be very dangerous in light of the content of the instant property damage.

In consideration of the criminal history of the defendant and the fact that it is impossible to view the attitude of reflect against the defendant in this court, the amount of fine prescribed in the summary order shall be increased and the punishment shall be determined as the same as the order.