logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2019.07.18 2018고단2944
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a business owner who operates a cream bank with the trade name "C" from the Daegu-Sast Forces B and the first floor.

1. No person who provides game products with the contents different from those of the game products classified as rating shall provide such game products for use different from those of the game products classified as rating;

Nevertheless, from November 24, 2017 to May 13:10, 2018, the Defendant established PC9 units in the above C from around November 24, 2017 to May 24, 2018. The Defendant acquired game money in the event of the purchase of Abama by using a red-to-teer, red-to-tea, red-to-tea, and red-tea game that was rated by the Game Management Committee. However, unlike the contents of the rating, the Defendant provided game products modified by means of directly charging and delivering game money by receiving cash from customers on the manager’s website.

As a result, the defendant provided game products different from the classified contents to customers for their use.

2. No person shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging such exchange or repurchase tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the same period and place as in the preceding paragraph, installed a red-mash spaers, red-mathy game with multiple computers, installed a red-mathy game with nine digital games, received user fees from unspecified customers in cash, and provided a ID by charging a game percentage through a manager page to the amount of money, and then made it possible for them to play a game. If a customer after the game, he exchanged a point obtained as a result of the game in cash.

Accordingly, the defendant was engaged in the business of exchanging tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The list of evidence of reports of internal investigation.

arrow