logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2016.12.09 2016누5274
국가유공자및보훈보상대상자등록거부처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. In the event that the grounds alleged by the Plaintiff in the trial while filing an appeal for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the Plaintiff in the first instance, and even if both the evidence submitted in the first instance and the purport of the entire pleadings in the first instance and the first instance trial are examined, the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the Plaintiff’s assertion on the grounds that there cannot be a proximate causal relationship between the blood transfusion caused by the closure of

Therefore, this court's explanation on this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case where "the difference" in the third party 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance is "the difference in this case," and "the performance of the plaintiff's military duty" in the fourth party 7 is "the plaintiff as "the plaintiff," and therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow