1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Public housing projects (C; hereinafter referred to as “instant public projects”): Defendant - Project operator’s announcement of an implementation plan for an urban planning facility project: on May 26, 2010, the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs announced on November 19, 2015 - Decision on expropriation: 1,663m2 (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”): The date of commencement of expropriation: January 12, 2016 - Compensation: 4,320,474,00 won - The appraisal corporation: V and W (hereinafter collectively referred to as “adjudication on expropriation”)’s announcement of an implementation plan for an urban planning facility project: the average of the appraised values of the appraisers on May 26, 2010; the appraisal results of the appraisal by the Central Land Expropriation Committee (hereinafter referred to as “adjudication on expropriation”)’s announcement of the appraisal results calculated on May 26, 2016; the appraisal results of the appraisal results of the appraiser’s appraisal results of the 20th appraisal (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal”).

(2) The Plaintiff filed a request for the supplementation and supplementation of appraisal by asserting that the amount of compensation should be determined on the premise that the land of this case and the land of this case and the land of this case and the land of this case and the land of this case are traded in a single unit. Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a request for the supplementation and supplementation of appraisal by asserting that compensation for the land of this case calculated by the court appraiser is KRW 5,808,526,400 (hereinafter “the second court appraisal”). The Plaintiff again filed a request for the supplementation and supplementation of appraisal by asserting that the amount of compensation should be determined on the premise that the road of urban planning facilities (e.g., K), which was scheduled to be constructed by passing the land of this case, should not be abolished, and that the court appraiser calculated accordingly.