A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 13, 2019, the Defendant stated to the effect that “B,” “B,” the Defendant, “C, Kakaox, sent KRW 500,000 to the victim D, who reported and contacted to post a notice of the sale of a new flap (Triop) in the C P PP, to the effect that “The 500,000 won is to be sent to the victim D.”

However, even if the defendant receives the amount of damage, he did not have the intention or ability to send the goods.

On October 13, 2019, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 470,000 from the E bank account (F) in the name of the Defendant, and received KRW 1,460,000 from that time on three occasions in total as shown in the annexed crime list.

Around March 4, 2020, the Defendant posted a letter to the effect that “C”, which is an Internet SNS, purchased a new post office post office post office post office post office post office post office post office post office post office post office post office post.” The Defendant called “C,” and sent the victim G with a view to remitting KRW 900,000,000.”

However, since the defendant did not possess the above objects, even if he received the above money, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above objects.

As above, the Defendant received KRW 900,000,00 from the victim as the price for the goods above on the same day from the victim, and received KRW 1,860,000 in total three times from that time to March 10, 202 in the following manner: (a) from that time, the Defendant was transferred to the H account in the name of the Defendant; and (b) from that time, the Defendant received KRW 1,860,000 in total from that time

[200 Highest 5164]

1. On January 24, 2020, the Defendant reported the victim J’s writing to the effect that the Defendant purchased Naki Emnaz’s sportsization posted to C at an infinite location, and made a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant would send the money first to send it.”

However, since the defendant did not possess the above objects, it was thought that he will consume them as living expenses, etc. even if he receives money from the victim.