A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 15:00 on February 19, 2016, the injured Defendant requested the victim to drink from the Estro in Jinju-si’s Da (n, 60 years of age), but he took the alcohol from the injured party. He saw the horses that he would be her, and she her her he she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she and she she she she she she she she she she she she she she, and she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she was

2. On March 9, 2016, from around 14:40 to 14:55 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s Schlage’s business by force by avoiding the disturbance, such as “the head of this farb farb farb farb farb farb farb farb,” and “the head of this farb farb farb farb farb farb farb farb farb farb far farb farb farb farb farb farb.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. Some statements made to G in the police statement protocol;

1. A detailed statement of the processing of each reported case;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Although there are many criminal records of the same type of crime on the grounds of sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection and observation, all of them are punished by a fine, and the part of the crime was denied and the agreement with the victim was not reached, the actual injury of the victim seems to be relatively minor compared to the number of diagnosis written in the crime (in the process of opening a cooling fluor in Schlage and preventing the victim from opening, the victim's chest was damaged by the defendant's arms, and the victim was receiving approximately two times medical treatment at the hospital). The victim himself/herself is re-written.