logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.03.23 2016고단4896
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 18:30 on July 21, 2016, 2016, the Defendant sent a victim C (the age of 55) who ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever, ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever, ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever

2. From October 3, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s Schlage’s business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as walking the gambling room operated by the victim E in Suwon-si, Suwon-si on October 10, 2016, which contains drinking water from the Schlage operated by the victim E in Suwon-si. The Defendant interfered with the victim’s Schlage’s business by force.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 4896"

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by C by the witness in the third public trial protocol;

1. References to inquiries (F regular tasks);

1. Two copies of the victim's bodily injury photo and the death diagnosis report (C) 2: 2016 Highest 6924;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police victim of E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the statements of G and H relevant witnesses;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act (an aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes with severe injury) shall be applied to concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The alleged defendant and his defense counsel are superior to the victim’s wife of the 2016 Highest 4896 case, which would be naturally cured even if they do not receive any separate treatment, and thus, the crime of injury is committed under the Criminal Act.

arrow