logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2019.07.25 2019고단358
사기등
Text

The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes of fraud against B and C, and each of the other crimes of fraud in the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 23, 2010, the Defendant sentenced 8 months to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime in the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court on April 23, 2010, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 26, 2010.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around February 25, 2009, on or around February 25, 2009, the defrauded made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would leave a large amount of profit from a bid to collect fire-related scrap metal at the scene” to the victim’s residence in the Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu D apartment E-B.

However, the Defendant engaged in the construction business under the name of “F” at the time, while having become bad credit card holders from around 2008 due to the lack of construction cost, etc., the Defendant was unable to pay the construction cost to many people due to the lack of credit card arrears, and the Defendant did not use money from the victim as a part of participating in the bidding, and was planned to use money to cover the Defendant’s office operating expenses, etc., so the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the money to the victim even if he borrowed money.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 10,000,000 won from the H account in the name of G designated by the Defendant on the same day as the loan money from the victim.

2. From March 5, 2009 to March 6, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would return KRW 100,000,000,000 including KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000) were employed by the Defendant as an employee of the said victim B, who was in

However, at the time, the Defendant engaged in construction business with the trade name “F”.

arrow