The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court, on the ground that the amount equivalent to the amount the Defendant received from the insurance company in relation to the acquisition and provision of personal information stated in the facts charged of this case cannot be subject to additional collection as prescribed in Article 48 of the Criminal Act,

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err in its judgment by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the subject of confiscation and additional collection under Article 48 of the Criminal Act

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed the entire part of the judgment below against the defendant, but did not state specific grounds for objection to the guilty part in the petition of appeal or the appellate brief.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.