1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff A is a former doctor who received alcohol addiction treatment, and the plaintiff B is the plaintiff's spouse.

The defendant C is a corporation operating the E Hospital in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and the defendant D was a person who had the intention of the E Hospital.

B. On November 18, 2013, the Plaintiff F and B consented to the Plaintiff’s hospitalization in E hospital as the legal guardian pursuant to Article 24(1) of the former Mental Health Act, and upon recognition of the need for hospitalization by Defendant D, the Plaintiff hospitalized in E hospital.

C. On March 25, 2014, Plaintiff A applied for 09:30 to stay outside the hospital. On March 26, 2014, Plaintiff A was found to be dissatisfing the floor of the substitute site under the influence of alcohol around 05:30 on March 26, 2014, and was sent back to the emergency room of the Gelim District of the Gelim District.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

On March 26, 2014, the medical doctor in charge of the Hanlim A Hospital diagnosed the Plaintiff on March 26, 2014: (i) focusing on the non-permanent trauma, (ii) focusing on the non-permanent trauma, (iii) the non-permanent lungs and tensions; (iv) the multi-closions and tensions, including the two cages cages, and (iii) the cages and tensions; (vi) the cages and closed of the two cages, (iv) the cages of the two cages, and the cages of the two cages without the open cages; (vii) the cages and sub-cerebrs of the two cages, and (iv) the cages of the two cages and sub-cerebrs of the two cages that have no open cages.

E. On March 26, 2014 and June 23, 2014, due to the instant accident, Plaintiff A received two types of climatic surgery on March 26, 2014, and received two types of climatic surgery on June 23, 2014, and at the same time, Plaintiff A was in the second degree of disability as it is necessary for other

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 10, 11, Eul evidence 3-4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiffs' assertion

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) negligence in the medical treatment (the main assertion of defendant D as the main doctor was well-known of the plaintiff A's hospitalization process and medical history, and the free outing of the plaintiff A between the plaintiff Eul and the defendant Eul.