logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2013.07.25 2012노441
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. According to the summary of the grounds for appeal (not guilty part) submitted by the prosecutor, the court below found Defendant A guilty on the part of the court below (the part where Defendant A inflicted bodily injury on both sides by physical fighting) and found Defendant A guilty on the face of the victim H, taken a quih, taken a step, and taken the face of the victim H, and Defendant B also took the face of the victim by taking the face of the victim, thereby causing bodily injury to the face and the face. However, the court below found Defendant B not guilty of this part of the facts charged.

2. According to the following circumstances acknowledged by the record of judgment, namely, the fact-finding reply to the J Hospital, immediately after the instant case, the victim appealeded only to the head of the water control unit, and did not mention the face or face, and the medical records do not contain any other external wounds, it is difficult to recognize that the Defendants took the face of the victim as stated in the facts charged, followed it, and taken it in drinking, and it is difficult to find the Defendants not guilty of this part of the facts charged.

3. According to the conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, in accordance with Article 25 of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, " August 16, 201" in Part 2 of the sixth decision of the court below shall be corrected to " August 16, 2012".

arrow