1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The defendant, around February 8, 2018, is driving a D car at the street in front of the Damo-gu, Busan (hereinafter referred to as the "car in this case") around February 22:17, 2018.

On April 9, 2018, in accordance with Article 93(1)6 of the Road Traffic Act, the Plaintiff issued a disposition revoking the Plaintiff’s Class 2 ordinary driving license (hereinafter “the instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff did not take measures, such as aiding victims, even if the Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as a diversal coordinate, which requires treatment for about three weeks in front of the parked vehicle, and did not take measures, such as aiding victims.

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. On February 18, 2018, the Plaintiff asserted that the instant passenger car is driving the instant passenger car in the status of drinking alcohol (0.038% alcohol level) around 22:17.

A car of the E-motor vehicle in the parking and a car of the F-driving in the front of the vehicle stopped, the vehicle was shocked annually, giving F a name and contact point to F, and the vehicle started first with E, F, etc.

Considering these circumstances, the Plaintiff’s act does not constitute a non-measures after a traffic accident, and thus, the instant disposition was made without a ground for disposition and is unlawful.

B. In full view of the written statements and arguments in the Evidence Nos. 3, 4, 4, and 4 to 7 of the No. 3-7, the judgment of the court below is as follows: ① Around February 22:17, 2018, the Plaintiff driven the instant vehicle and operated the instant vehicle on a two-lane road in front of the HH oil station located in Suwon-gu G, Busan, from the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction of the Gu, along with two-lanes from the East-gu, the ender of the instant vehicle stopped while driving the instant vehicle from the head of the Si/Gun/Gu to the ender of the instant vehicle; ② The Plaintiff got the ender of the instant vehicle after the vehicle stopped in the front of the vehicle; ② the instant accident caused the Plaintiff to suffer injuries, such as a multi-facel share, which requires treatment for about three weeks; and the injury of the F, which requires treatment of the vehicle by the head of the Si/Gun/Gu; and