logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.05.19 2015고정1000
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a building controlled entity C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”).

While operating the building, from December 27, 2007 to December 2014, 2014, the manager of the D building in Bupyeong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City) concluded an entrustment contract with E and took charge of the management of the building.

In May 2014, the Defendant prepared the “detailed statement of imposition of management expenses” in May 2014 at the office of the Co., Ltd., Ltd., which was located in Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si and 401, the Defendant: (a) set a total of KRW 142,500 under the name of “worker’s Day”; and (b) claimed management expenses in proportion to the victim G (501) who is the occupant of the above building; (c) the victim’s name and non-victim (101 occupant I and J representative; 103 occupant L; (d) the victim M (104 occupant representative; and (e) the victim’s victim’s name and non-resident representative; (e) the victim’s victim’s name (the victim’s occupant occupant representative and representative within and outside of 201 PP branch); (e) the victim’s sales (the victim and the victim’s representative after Q 301; and (e) the victim’s 302 RP shop occupant (the victim representative).

However, the facts revealed that the environmental U.S. source V, working at the above building, has already been retired in July 2013, and even if there was no new employment of the environmental U.S. source, the management expenses in the name of the “worker’s Day” allowance, which was employed by the environmental U.S. source, were collected on behalf of the defendant, and the defendant was thought to be used individually, and the management expenses was imposed on the “worker’s Day” as an allowance to be paid to W who is a parking management personnel, and did not pay to the said W,

As seen above, the Defendant: (a) was included in the general management expenses item of May 2014, and claimed as the notice of the management expenses to the said victims, who were the victims of the building including the victim G, to pay the “worker’s Day” allowance to the said victims; and (b) was from the said victims.

arrow