Escopics
Defendant
Prosecutor
The current state of prosecution, the current state of prosecution, and the current state of trial.
Defense Counsel
Attorney Kim Jong-kon (Korean)
Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Facts charged;
On November 12, 2011, the Defendant, around 12:30 on November 12, 201, committed an indecent act by force on the part of the victim, who was an employee of the main store of the Gangnam-gu Seoul ( Address omitted) ○○○○○, an entertainment drinking club underground floor 3, the first floor of the ○○○, a main store, and talked.
2. Determination
The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 298 of the Criminal Act and can be prosecuted only when the victim's complaint is filed pursuant to Article 306 of the same Act. According to the records, the victim can recognize the fact that the victim revoked the complaint against the non-indicted who is in the relation of the defendant and the accomplice on February 16, 2012, prior to the prosecution of this case. The effect of revocation of the complaint is against the defendant who is the accomplice of the non-indicted under Article 233 of the Criminal Procedure Act. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5
Judge Lee fixed-term