logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.01.10 2016구합106666
시설사용면적배분처분취소
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the Defendant, on June 19, 2015, committed against the Association B on June 19, 2015, the Daejeon Sung-dong-dong-ro 33.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

Pursuant to Article 2 (2) and (3) of the former Act on Distribution and Price Stabilization of Agricultural and Fishery Products (amended by Act No. 6699, May 13, 2002; hereinafter “former Act on Distribution and Price Stabilization of Agricultural and Fishery Products”), the establishment of standards for the allocation of the area for the use of facilities is a “central wholesale market” established in the Seongdong-gu Nowon-gu, Daejeon Metropolitan City in July 2001, and the Plaintiff and B Association (hereinafter “B Association”) are wholesale market corporations designated by Article 2 (7) of the former Act on Distribution and Price Stabilization of Agricultural and Fishery Products.

According to Article 6 (1) and attached Table 3 of the Daejeon Metropolitan City Ordinance on the Management and Operation of Agricultural and Fishery Products Wholesale Market, two wholesale market corporations may be established in E-type of the wholesale market in this case, and only the Plaintiff and B Cooperatives shall be designated as a wholesale market corporation of E-type from the time of the establishment of the wholesale market in this case.

At the time of opening the wholesale market of this case, the Plaintiff and B agreed to distribute the area as follows, but on October 26, 200, the Plaintiff and B agreed to distribute the area as follows.

Matters concerning implementation agreements between corporations;

7. Adjustment of areas used for facilities at intervals of three years according to the results of the evaluation of wholesale market corporations pursuant to Article 77 of the Act on Distribution and Price Stabilization of Agricultural and Fishery Products;

Main Facility Area Allocation - Adjustment of Major Facility Area Allocation - Plaintiff: Priority, B: 420 2,357 (67.8%) 2,074 (32.2%) 6,431 3,507 (55%) E, 4,878 3,608 1,600 4,8782,478 2,478 2,4782,40 420 297 4297 420 297 297 297 32,123/5 12,53160 298 831,250 250 2,251,215 30 1,250 2,251,2013, 25, 2013, 25, 3201, 25, 2013, 325, 201, 2015 3, 2015 2,

arrow