beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for a period of one year and two months, and each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of six months.
except that this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] Defendant C is a person who was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Suwon method Board on October 11, 2016, and two years of suspended execution, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 19th of the same month, and is currently under the grace period.
[Criminal facts]
1. In the course of the Defendants’ crime of public offering of fraud from May 2012, Defendant B, who operated a cleaning station business from around May 2012, the Defendants: (a) received a loan from Defendant C, and Defendant C, and Defendant A, which made it difficult to operate the said company due to the occurrence of an accident of workers’ death; (b) made it difficult to pay the industrial accident insurance premium and the aggravation of management; and (c) leased a vehicle in the name of the management of the said company; and (d) made a loan to the said company; (c) Defendant B prepared for the personal seal impression of the management of the K in the case of a car lease agreement and related documents, rubber, etc.; (d) concluded a lease agreement with Defendant C and Defendant A, and (e) conspired Defendant A to take the role of financing money by distributing the leased vehicle.
In accordance with the above public offering, Defendant B prepared for the head of the KUE's seal imprint certificate, rubber, etc. necessary for the vehicle lease contract at a place where it is impossible to know the end of March, 2014, and Defendant C, Defendant C, and Defendant A entered into a contract with the KUWW740 Li car lease in the name of the LUW 740 Li car lease for each of the 36 months-day lease fees, around April 1, 2014, as Seoul Seocho-gu, the 11-day 36 gallonggalian Co., Ltd., in Seocho-gu, Seoul, 427, as if Defendant C were to pay the vehicle rent from the FUW 740 Li car loan in the name of the FUW 33,000 EM.
However, in fact, defendant B, E, which was operated by the company, was virtually closed due to the aggravation of the company operation, and the defendants distributed the leased vehicle in lots.