Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and for a defendant B, for two years, respectively.

No. 140 to 149 of seized evidence.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act in the Changwon District Court's Msan Branch on August 11, 2015, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on January 1, 2016, and is currently under the grace period, which became final and conclusive on January 1, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A

A. Fraud takes charge of the overall crime of fraud of vehicles, including securing the vehicle notification of external vehicles, car rental car car color, inclusion of inner brocons, registration certificate forgery, etc., and the Defendant, H, I, and J, upon the direction of G, by approaching the vehicle to the loaner or delivering it to the bonder. K, L, L, M, N, an Internet portal site and SNS, etc. The role of arranging external siren through the Internet portal site and SNS was performed, and P, as a non-registered credit service provider, shared the role of lending external vehicles as security or disposing of the vehicle on a large-scale basis. After receiving the vehicle from the lessee or the personal car rental service provider who wishes to succeed to the lease, and provided the vehicle as security, and provided the vehicle to the delivery service provider, etc., and provided the loan and provided the loan to the bond broker, etc., and offered the loan by order.

1) On April 3, 2017, the victim S, who leased R R R R R R R R R R R R-type in a non-permanent area (hereinafter referred to as the Daejeon Pung-gu) in accordance with the joint fraud with G, etc., approaches the victim S with the knowledge that he/she intends to engage in personal sirens through the Internet portal site and SNS reporters, and then, “the vehicle will be KRW 350,000 won per month for the rental of the vehicle.”

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, I et al. transferred the above vehicle delivered by the victim S to the defendant and G, and the defendant and G have no intention or ability to pay the rental fee as agreed to the victim because they planned to provide the above vehicle as a collateral to the bond company and to obtain a loan to the bond company.

The defendant is G, I, etc.