logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원충주지원 2017.09.14 2017가단21001
배당이의
Text

1. As to the Cheongju District Court B real estate auction case B, the said court prepared on March 22, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The debtor had already been declared bankrupt by the Seoul Central District Court on May 24, 2016, and the above court appointed A as a trustee in bankruptcy.

B. Korea Bank (hereinafter “Korea Bank”) already filed an application for voluntary auction against the land and its ground buildings located in Cheongju District Court, Cheongju District Court, Cheongju District Court, Cheongju District Court, Cheongju District Court, Cheongju District Court, which had already been a creditor of Rotterdam, filed an application for voluntary auction against the land and its ground buildings located in Cheongju-gun, Samsung-gun, Samsung, Cheongju (hereinafter “instant auction procedure”). Since then, Cheongju District Court had already transferred the claim against Dak to the Defendant, and on August 16, 2016, the Plaintiff reported the claim amount of KRW 27,681,166 in total with C’s unpaid wage, retirement allowance, D’s unpaid wage, retirement allowance, and retirement allowance claims.

C. C’s wage claim against C is KRW 4,569,448 for 45 days, retirement allowance claim for the last three years, KRW 13,545,65 for 13 years, wage claim for D for 2,163,766 for January, and retirement allowance claim for the last three years is KRW 6,19,112 for 3 years.

On March 22, 2017, the Cheongju District Court: (a) prepared a distribution schedule for the instant auction procedure (hereinafter “instant distribution schedule”); (b) distributed the total amount of KRW 842,950 to the voice group that requested issuance of the pertinent tax in the first order; and (c) KRW 457,435,842 to the Defendant in the second order; and (d) did not distribute to the Plaintiff in relation to the wage and retirement allowance claims reported by the Plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's statements in Gap's 1 to 5, 7 to 10, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. If it is impossible to repay the total amount of debt, the summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion (hereinafter “Rehabilitation Act”) is also an estate claim, such as wage claims with priority.

arrow