1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one and half years;

2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for a period of four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) and the Road Traffic Act (drawing driving).

On August 14, 2017, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.239% during blood transfusions on August 14, 2017, while driving the said vehicle, and proceeded into the vicinity of the rupture intersections located in 136-17 of the two weeks at the same time in the two weeks, as the ebbbbs of the ebs.

At the time, since it is night and the movement of vehicles is frequent, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle according to his own vehicle line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, had been negligent in driving in a state where normal driving is difficult and led to the Defendant’s full part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle with the victim C(32 ) driving Dystren driver’s vehicle, which was going to the East Dobcheon-do in the front of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as “other and the balone’s balone and the balone’s balone’s balone base,” which requires approximately two weeks of treatment by occupational negligence, including “the balone’s balone and the balone’s balone’s balone,” and “the balone’s balone’s balone and the balone’s base.”

2. On August 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 22:35, at Yangju-si, sent the victim two paths by saying, “A public official belonging to the police station of the Yangju Police Station, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report on drinking traffic accidents as stipulated in paragraph (1) above at the 112-round the intersection of 136-17 in Yangju-si, Yangju-si, who was a police officer belonging to the F District of the Yangju Police Station, demanded the Defendant to take a alcohol test; and (b) he was under the influence of alcohol, so he did not have any difficult driving.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment No. 1]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C.