logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.10.20 2015고단2211
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BM7 car.

1. On April 2, 2015, the Defendant violated a traffic accident: (a) driven the said SM7 car on April 12:10, 2015; and (b) made a turn to the left at about 70 km each hour at the speed of the government from the direction of the sub-deficial region, along the two-lanes from the direction of the sub-deficial region.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely according to the traffic signal to a person engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left on the left, and received the front part of the victim's driving DSS3's driving (the age of 49) driving from the right side of the direction of the Defendant to the left side according to the closed-down signal by negligence in contravention of the signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as fluoral salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

2. On April 2, 2015, the Defendant continued to drive the said SM7 car on April 2, 2015, and continued to drive the said SM7 car, leading to the passage of the six-lane from the intersection in the south of both cities to the intersection in the south of both cities, leading to the passage of a six-lane crossing in the direction of the government from the direction of the eastbridge to the speed of about 70km along the opposite lane.

Since there is a six-lane road from which the central line is installed, there was a duty of care to keep the lane well for those engaged in driving service and prevent accidents in advance by driving safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this, and caused the above negligence while driving the station line to the left at the right side of the last place of the Defendant’s course, by driving the F. F. F. M. car of the victim E(39 years old) who turn to the left from the west to the west-do left.

arrow