logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.12.20 2016가단24182
소유권확인
Text

1. It is confirmed that each land listed in the separate sheet is owned by the plaintiff.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;

Reasons

1. In fact, the forest and field government and the cadastral record regarding the land indicated in the table below were destroyed by Korean War, and the owner’s restoration or cadastral register restoration was subsequently made, and the registration conversion or land category change was subsequently unregistered as of the date of each land listed in the annexed sheet (hereinafter “instant land”).

On May 1, 1965, the owner of May 1, 1960, the person who was registered as the owner on the land surface of the land of this case of this case of this case of land No. 3 on May 1, 1965 in the annexed sheet No. 2 E of the annexed sheet No. 2 of the Registration Conversion Report No. 2 of the annexed sheet No. 2 of the Registration Conversion Report No. 1 on September 1, 1960, the owner of the land of this case on May 1, 1965, whose land category is changed and registered as the owner on the land surface of this case of this case of this case of land No. 3 as of June 30, 196.

F, who had his permanent domicile in Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon, was born and died on May 15, 1958, and on April 14, 194, the Republic of Korea first died, and on May 14, 194, and on May 31, 1954, the Republic of Korea first succeeded to the F, who died of the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea first succeeded to the Republic of Korea on May 31, 1954.

Since September 15, 1967, K died on September 15, 1967 and on October 30, 1967, K died and died on January 24, 1993, and his heir M, self-employed, N,O, P, Q, R, S, and T (the mother of S and T among them).

M was deceased on December 22, 2014, and upon death of M, it succeeded to that type of S and T and U.

After that, T was deceased on January 14, 2016 and succeeded to wife V, G, X, and Y.

On July 29, 2017, K’s heir (N, Plaintiff,O, P, Q, R, S, and T’s substitute heir (V, W, X, Y), who is the sole heading heir of F, agreed on the division of inherited property with the purport that the Plaintiff would solely inherit the instant land owned by F.

The Plaintiff managed the instant land for a long time, and paid taxes and public charges.

[Ground for Recognition: Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 61 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply)

(ii) Nos. (i) and (ii), and the purport of the entire pleading

2. The above facts of recognition.

arrow