beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From February 2, 2001 to December 2, 2013, the Defendant was in charge of business management in relation to the supply of soft parts, such as D, which play a role to prevent mechanical corrosion, from being supplied with 105m towing booms, to C (ju) with the Defense Acquisition Program Administration.
1. Around January 2013, the Defendant: (a) instructed the E company office located in the Youngdo, Busan; (b) on December 17, 2012, the sample number previously held by the Accounting Personnel G, “metallic” in the name of the Republic of Korea Tring & Rearch Rearitt Ltd. on December 17, 2012, 2012, to increase the source content of TAP-02300; and (c) around that time, the said G had the said TP REPR to copy the said TS RE RETRT with a copy; and (d) had the said G output from “84%” to “84%” to “74%” to “6.4%” to “6.4%” to “6.4%” to “6.4%” to “4%” to “45%” to “6.4%” to “6.
Around January 2013, the Defendant sent a copy of the Korea Testing & Redch Inc. in the name of TEST REPT to H of D Production Management Director, who is unaware of such fact, using facsimile, at the above E-S office.
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant modified one copy of Korea Testing & Amp, which is a private document related to a certificate of fact, under the name of Red Shearsch, REPRT (Re Report No: TP-02300) and exercised it.
2. Around January 2013, the Defendant: (a) sent a copy copy as if the document altered to the above H, as described in paragraph (1) was a document duly formed; (b) deceiving the Defendant as if the original content value, such as e.g., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., ESTPP; (c) supplied e.g., 3,000 of shot (ms 35794-5) manufactured at E company around March 2013; and (d) received KRW 10,800,000 from D representative I for the supply price of the said part.
Accordingly, the defendant's 10,800,000 won is paid for the supply of goods by licensing from the victim I.