The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (three million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. However, as if the Defendant conspired with B to sell goods by accessing the Internet “ direct trade” site, the Defendant committed the instant crime by deceiving the victims the proceeds of goods worth KRW 6 million on 32 occasions in total. In light of the method of committing the instant crime repeatedly against many and unspecified persons, the nature of the crime is inferior, the amount of damage is not much small, and no measures for recovery of particular damage have been taken until the trial, and the various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments have been taken in full view of the following: the Defendant’s age, family environment, and circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, etc., the Defendant’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.