The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The judgment of the court below shall be held in two months of imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes of Articles 1 through 5 of the judgment of the court below.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant was guilty of each of the facts charged in Article 4, 9, and 12 of the judgment of the court below on the ground that there was no fact that the Defendant, together with H, purchased a penphone, or administered a penphone that received without compensation, by dividing it into H, and provided another penphone that purchased or received through H with H without compensation.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (each of the crimes of subparagraphs 1 through 5 of the original decision: imprisonment for four months, and each crime of Articles 6 through 17 of the decision of the court below: imprisonment for one year and six months, confiscation, collection 2,060,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant made a statement from the investigative agency to the date of the first trial of the court below that recognized all the facts charged of Articles 4, 9, and 12 of the judgment of the court below. In particular, with respect to the facts charged of Articles 3 and 4 of the judgment of the court below, the prosecution made a statement to the effect that “the Defendant, upon the suspended sentence on March 29, 2013, received Ha from Ha to Ha and delivered half of Ha with H with H, in commemoration, after having been released from the suspended sentence on March 29, 2013.” The Defendant initially made a statement to the effect that “the Defendant is living together, division,” and “the Defendant purchased Ha with Ha and 9 of the judgment of the court below because Ha had a large volume of purchased Halopon with Ha and purchased Halopon to Ha, it is difficult to specify whether the Defendant made Halop to Ha and Halop to Ha, but if I had mixed Ha, I wish to do so with Ha one Hah.