Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 8, 2019, the Defendant, at the office of “C Union” located in B from around 16:00 to around 17:00 on the same day, and the Defendant, despite that the victim D, who was the former president of the said credit cooperative, did not have sexual intercourse with E, the former president of the said credit cooperative, and did not have sexual intercourse with the latter president of the said credit cooperative, the Defendant was found to F of the said credit cooperative president, and even if he did not have sexual intercourse with E, the latter president of the said credit cooperative, the male employee H and female employees, during the hearing of the managing director of G, the former president of the E and the former president of the said credit cooperative, who did not have sexual intercourse with the latter and did not have any sexual intercourse with the latter.

As a result, the Defendant, by pointing out false facts, damaged the honor of the victim.

2. The Defendant said, at the above date, at the above time, at the above place, that “I have ever been fluently fluent with the president F, G, male staff H and female employees,” and that “I have fluently fluently fluent with the lower time, who is a human garbage. I will fluently fluent with the lower time when I had fluently fluently fluent with the lower time, because I have fluently fluently fluent with the lower time, I have fluently flu

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the Defendant’s partial statement D, F, H, and G to each police protocol of statement filed by the Defendant for the investigation of the accusation report (CCTV data attached);

1. Relevant Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act (a point of defamation), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The summary of the Defendant’s assertion regarding the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was insulting and threatened by the victim.

In order to file a legitimate civil petition against this, the Defendant sought CF and explained the circumstances of the case, as stated in the facts charged of the instant case.