The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment (eight months of imprisonment and four months of imprisonment) imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized, and cooperation with the narcotics investigation is favorable to the defendant, but the crime related to narcotics is disadvantageous to the defendant in terms of social harm and risk of recidivism, etc., and other circumstances that are disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the fact that the crime was committed against him, and that the crime was committed against him, on September 11, 2012, in support of Suwon District Court, which was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and a suspended sentence of two years for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 19, 2012, and the crime of the above crime and crime of Articles 7 through 9 of the judgment of the court below, which became final and conclusive on September 19, 2012, and the suspended sentence becomes invalidated by preventing the crime of the above crime of the court below and the crime of the above crime of the above case committed during the suspended sentence period. Considering the various circumstances that become the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the court below is too inappropriate.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.