(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.12.21 2018고정1516

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.12.21 2018고정1516

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 18, 2010, the Defendant would allow the victim E to purchase the G heading, H heading, and I heading of the building of the above building, which is approximately KRW 2.5 billion in the market price, around 18, 2010, the victim E in the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “D D D Multiheading”.

In addition, the purport was that the said store is offered as security to obtain a loan from one bank, and that the ownership transfer may be made, and that the said store is changed to two million won as down payment.

However, the above building is owned by J, and the defendant was not the manager of the above building, and there was no right to dispose of the store in the building, and even if he received the down payment from the damaged person, he actually offered the store as security or transferred ownership, and there was no intention or ability to sell the store at a low price.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 2 million won through the post office account (Account Number:K) in the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim.

2. On May 20, 2010, the Defendant had a problem with “other contracts” to the victim.

The president of the above building first terminated the right to collateral security established in relation to the case of the contract at issue, and then decided to proceed with the contract with the victim. The amount to be resolved falls short of one million won and the amount to be resolved is changed.

However, as stated in the above Paragraph 1, the defendant was not the administrator of the above building, and the victim did not have any intention or ability to sell the store at a price lower than the market price.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 1 million won through the post office account (Account Number:K) in the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. The police of the defendant.

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 논산지원 2017.07.14 2017고단100

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2013.11.06 2013고단602

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.02.08 2016고단1949

-부산지법 1987. 5. 16. 선고 86가합1585 제8민사부판결 : 확정

-서울남부지방법원 2018.11.01 2017고단5794