1. The Defendant’s KRW 135,363,352 out of KRW 175,49,896 and the said money to the Plaintiff and KRW 135,363,352 from April 15, 2014 to October 10, 2014.

1. The facts below are based on the following facts: (a) the plaintiff and the defendant did not dispute with each other; (b) Gap evidence 1-1-4; (c) Gap evidence 2-1-3; and (d) Eul evidence 3; and (c) the purport of the whole pleadings.

On October 31, 2007, the Plaintiff lent KRW 200 million to B (hereinafter “B”) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) and set the expiration date of the loan on October 30, 2010 by means of equal repayment method of principal and interest per month, and the Defendant, which was the representative director of B, guaranteed the above loan obligation against the Plaintiff of B on the same day.

(B) from the next day, “the first loan contract of this case” is only called “the first loan contract of this case”).

On February 19, 2009, the Plaintiff lent KRW 150 million to B Company, and decided on February 18, 2012 as of the expiry date of the loan by means of equal repayment method of principal and interest per month, and the Defendant, which had been the representative director of B Company, guaranteed the above loan obligation against the Plaintiff on the same day.

(2) The second loan contract of this case is referred to only as "the second loan contract of this case".

On July 21, 2009, the Defendant expressed to the Plaintiff the consent to extend the period of the first loan contract of this case and the repayment period of repayment of principal and interest for one year.

B Company failed to pay KRW 13,310,00 in total to the principal amount until the expiry date of each loan contract of this case (the expiration date of the first loan contract of this case as extended one year pursuant to the agreement) (i.e., the principal amount of the second loan contract of this case of this case of KRW 58,310,000 in total) and interest KRW 1,278,012 in total (i.e., interest balance of the second loan contract of this case of this case of KRW 473,291 in interest balance of the second loan contract of this case of this case of this case of KRW 473,291 in interest balance of the second loan contract of this case of this case of this case of KRW 804,721 in interest amount of the second loan contract of this case). Upon entering into each loan contract of this case of this case of

E. The Plaintiff spent KRW 775,340 in total as provisional seizure costs to preserve the claim under the first loan contract of this case, and the instant case.