logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.05.21 2014고단5449
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 10, 2014, at around 04:00, the Defendant: (a) was able to drive a car in front of the commercial building of Taedop apartment located in 1975, on July 10, 2014; (b) D CTT 100 Oba, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 500,00,000, was 500,000 in front of the commercial building of Taedop apartment located in Daegu Jung-gu, Daegu.

On January 14, 2015, the Defendant found one of the gallon-2 mobile phones owned by the victim E in the street in the vicinity of the new cancer dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Gagno No. 2015.

The Defendant did not take necessary procedures, such as returning the acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

"2014 Highest 549"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of C (victim) 2015 Highest 1722;

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment against the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Among concurrent offenders, the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act / [the scope of recommending punishment] the reason for sentencing under Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act / [the scope of recommending punishment ] There is no person who has a basic area (6 to 1 year and 6 months) for general property / [the standard for handling multiple crimes] [the minimum of sentencing is a concurrent crime between crimes for which the sentencing guidelines have not been established]. The defendant has a record of receiving juvenile protective disposition at the minimum of the crime for which the sentencing guidelines have not been set. The defendant has been sentenced several times as a single crime. On May 23, 2014, the Daegu District Court sentenced two years of suspended sentence to imprisonment with prison labor for a special larceny, etc. at the Daegu District Court on June 31 of the same month, which became final and conclusive, and again sentenced to the crime

arrow