Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. 공소사실의 요지 피고인 A는 B 주식회사의 대표이사이고, 피고인 B 주식회사는 건축공사업 등을 목적으로 설립된 법인으로서 1998. 9. 8. 토목건축공사업 등록을 한 건설업자이고, 피고인 C은 E을 운영하는 사람이다. 가.

Defendant

A No constructor shall have another person receive a contract for or perform any construction works by using his name or trade name.

Nevertheless, around May 27, 2008, the Defendant had C operating E receive supply of and demand for the remodelling work using the name of the Defendant’s company, and had C perform the said work, and had C receive and perform the construction work using the Defendant’s trade name during five times from the above date and time to June 15, 2009 as shown in the crime list.

B. Around May 27, 2008, Defendant B, the representative director of the Defendant, had C, who is the Defendant, receive supply of and demand for construction work using the Defendant’s trade name, and had C perform the said construction work from the above date to June 15, 2009, using the Defendant’s trade name.

C. On May 27, 2008, the Defendant received a supply of construction work using the trade name of the company B, and performed the construction work, and the Defendant received and performed the construction work using the trade name of the said company from the above date to June 15, 2009, as shown in the separate crime list, from the above date to the above date and time to June 15, 2009.

2. We examine the judgment, the witness H’s legal statement as shown in the above facts charged is difficult to easily believe in light of the witness I, J and K’s respective legal statements, and other prosecutorial statements.