logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2015.12.02 2015누22165
고엽제후유증환자 유족비대상결정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[The plaintiff is basically repeating the same argument in the first instance trial. The judgment of the court of first instance that held that even if the plaintiff considered the allegations and the reasons why some supplementation was made in the trial, and the statement of the evidence No. 5 additionally submitted in the trial, it cannot be recognized that the deceased died due to the Hemical heart disease is justifiable]

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and it is dismissed as the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow