logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.12.21 2016고단6803
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year.

However, the above judgment is delivered to the defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. at the Busan District Court on August 29, 2016, and two years of suspension of execution on September 6, 2016, which became final and conclusive on September 6, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant

A shall exercise overall control over the commercial sex acts that employ female employees in several officetels and studios, and Defendant B leased officetels and studio in the name of the principal, and Defendant B, according to the direction of Defendant A, promoted commercial sex acts with the trade name of “E” through the entertainment site of “D (one-day D)”, and notified only the customers confirmed to be not public officials in charge of the control of police officers, etc. through the so-called “certification” procedure to verify their identity against the customers who contacted with the business cell phone numbers, etc. on the relevant site, and planned to operate the so-called “so-called “so-called sexual sex acts” business place in which sexual sex acts are conducted at least 130,000 or 2.60,000 won in consideration of sexual intercourse.

According to the above public offering, around October 9, 2016, the Defendants: (a) reported commercial sex acts advertising the trade name “E” at the “D” entertainment site; and (b) received KRW 130,00 won from G and sexual intercourse; (c) around September 2016, the Defendants engaged in commercial sex acts in a total of six commercial sex acts, as described in the separate list of crimes, from September 2016 to October 20, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Examination protocol of the suspect of G by the prosecution;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of H, I, J, K, and L;

1. Each police protocol of statement against M and N;

1. Each internal investigation report, each investigation report, each seizure report, and each report.

arrow