logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.02.02 2016구합53227
과징금부과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the costs incurred by participation.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a person running a private taxi transport business using B-si (hereinafter “instant taxi”).

B. On July 24, 2013, the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) publicly notified the following improvement order for passenger transport business as follows pursuant to Article 23(1)9 of the Passenger Transport Service Act (hereinafter “passenger Transport Service Act”).

(hereinafter referred to as the "order for Business Improvement"). In the event of a violation of the provisions of the laws related to the use in the Gu, the subject of the disposition and the subject of the installation of the detailed taxi card settlement machine and the subject of the location setting: A transport business entity shall install a card settlement terminal for the settlement of taxi charges.

The location of card terminals shall be installed as follows for the convenience of taxi passengers:

-The equipment main body capable of recognizing the Magic card shall be between the left side of the Magic card and the steering seat): Provided, That if the Magic card has been installed in the Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic Magic

Transport business operators under Article 23 of the Passenger Transport Act, which is subject to the application of Article 23 of the Enforcement Decree of the Passenger Transport Act at the time of violation of Article 23 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act (attached Table 3): 3:40 days of 20 days of 20 days of 20 days of 20 days of 20 days of 40 days of 20 days of 40 days of 20 days

C. On November 6, 2015, the Plaintiff was affiliated with the Intervenor, in violation of the instant business improvement order at the charging station around 14:29, while attaching a card terminal (float card) at the lower right side of the taxi driver’s seat of this case in violation of the instant business improvement order.

arrow