Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff is a person running a private taxi transport business using B-si (hereinafter “instant taxi”).
B. On July 25, 2013, the Mayor of Seoul Special Metropolitan City publicly announced an order to improve passenger transport business and matters to be observed as follows pursuant to Article 23(1) of the Passenger Transport Service Act (hereinafter “passenger Transport Service Act”) in order to promote the use of taxi and provide convenience for taxi passengers to easily settle, and prevent transport employees from demanding cash settlement to passengers.
(hereinafter referred to as the "order for Business Improvement". In the event of a violation of the provisions of the laws and regulations related to the use in the Gu, taxi transport business entities shall install a card settlement terminal for the payment of taxi fares: The location of the card terminal shall be as follows for the convenience of taxi passengers - The equipment main body that can recognize the card shall be left (on the left between the driver's seat and the chief) - The IC card recognition card recognition card - The card terminal installed above shall be able to use the pre-payment and the post-payment card; if the card terminal is not operated normally, it shall be suspended operation and shall be maintained immediately; if the taxi is not operated normally, the taxi business entities shall install the card settlement terminal for the payment of the taxi fares; and if it is not operated normally, the taxi business entities shall install the card settlement terminal for the payment of the taxi fares, the location of the card terminal shall be installed as follows; for the convenience of the taxi passengers, the equipment main body that can recognize the card shall be left before the first place (on the top): The driver's first place (on): the card 2.
C. At around 14:00 on December 14, 2015, the Plaintiff operated a passenger on board to the Seoul Central Market (the New Market). At that time, the passengers were at the time of the operation of the Plaintiff on the following day.