The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The court below found the defendant not guilty on the ground that there is no evidence of reinforcement in addition to the confessions of the defendant, and found the defendant not guilty on the ground that there is no evidence of reinforcement in addition to the confessions of the defendant, even though there is evidence to reinforce the confessions of the defendant, such as a warrant of seizure on the account used for the crime, screen by the gambling site where the defendant used the gambling site, and a verdict of conviction on the AR which gambling was

2. The court below found the defendant not guilty of the facts charged of this case on the grounds that there is no evidence of reinforcement in addition to the confession of the defendant. Since it is sufficient for the prosecutor to reinforce the confession of the defendant in the statement of deposit transaction (deposit and withdrawal) submitted as evidence in the trial of the party, the prosecutor's appeal is with merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is with merit, and the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is again decided as follows after pleading.

【The reason for the decision to use again 【B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I’s own Internet site’s “B, E, H, F, H, and I” is a illegal gambling site operated as a result of the commission of the crime-based member’s online site “act of collecting the betting amount and exchanging the cyber money in cash if the members want to do so.” The amount of cyber money should be charged to the members, and the members anticipated to win, lose, and win and lose various sports games inside and outside the country through the above cyber money, and then the member would be entitled to receive the betting amount by multiplying the betting amount by the dividend rate, and if the members want to do so, the amount of betting amount should be recovered and exchange the cyber money in cash.”

From March 8, 2016 to May 30, 2016, the Defendant opened a house of the Defendant in K of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul J building and opened a separate site from the said site to the account designated by the said site from the N Bank Account (O) in his/her name after accessing each site.