Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On September 25, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on October 3, 2014 by the Daegu District Court for the following reasons: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two months for the following reasons: (b) the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for writing, electronic records, etc.

"2016 Highest 2733" was used by the defendant as a member of a securities company while working as a member of the securities company, when the defendant suffered loss while operating the investment funds of the B and C couple who is a customer, and had his/her father D receive a demand for return of the investment funds from the customers, and he/she had the defendant's debt D with a certificate of his/her father D's personal seal impression issued

1. On May 21, 2012, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) stated D’s name, resident registration number, address, etc. in the proxy form for the issuance of a certificate of seal imprint on the proxy form for the issuance of a certificate of seal imprint in the form of official approval color; (b) stated D’s name, resident registration number, address, etc. in the item for the purpose of use as “a certificate” and “a delegating absence” in the column for delegation; and (c) affixed D’s seal imprint in advance

For the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a letter of proxy to issue a certificate of seal imprint in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as indicated in paragraph (1), issued a false certificate of seal imprint to a public official of the competent community service center who is aware of the forgery and exercised the same as the document duly formed.

[Attachment 2016 Highest 4873] The Defendant, while working as an employee of a securities company, was incurred by managing the investment funds of the clients B and C, and was urged by the customers to refund the investment funds, and was arbitrarily issued with the certificate of the personal seal impression of Da in order to escape this. Using this, the Defendant had used the certificate of the personal seal impression of Do in order to raise D as a joint and several surety for the repayment of the Defendant’s debt.

【Criminal Facts】

On May 21, 2012, the defendant was a notary public in the Daegu Suwon-gu General Law Office of Law Firm, and the facts are the defendant's father.