The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (eight months) on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court determined the Defendant’s punishment within a reasonable scope by fully taking into account the circumstances surrounding the sentencing of the Defendant as stated in detail on the grounds of the sentencing, and taking into account the sentencing criteria of the Supreme Court’s sentencing committee.

I seem to appear.

Although the defendant additionally deposited KRW 6 million for the bereaved family members of the victim in the trial of the party, it is difficult to view that it is a circumstance that can be newly considered in the trial of the party in consideration of the fact that the bereaved family members of the victim did not know about or make an effort to reach an agreement on the part of the defendant, and that the defendant sought a severe punishment by asserting that only the defendant would be able to engage in the sentencing due to deposit, or the amount and time of deposit.

As a result, the defendant's assertion is not accepted because the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.