Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is also a person who is engaged in driving a bareboat vehicle.

On June 21, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on June 21, 201:20, and led the two-lanes in front of the Gandong Education and Culture Center in the Gandong-gu, Pacific-ro, Pacific Island to the speed of speed in the speed of speed at the speed of the hour, depending on the one-lane distance from the edge of the Lina road.

Since there are crosswalks where a normal operation signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check whether there is a person who gets on the way to reduce the speed and to see well the right and the right and the right and the right, and to drive safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting the fact that the vehicle's progress signal is changed to the stop signal, the part of the victim C (Woo, 32 years old) who was standing on the right side of the pedestrian signal, such as the blance of the victim C (Woo) who was standing on the right side from the pedestrian signal, was received as the front part of the right side of the victim and got the victim to go beyond the floor together with his son D (Woo, 1 year old) who was on the part of the victim.

As a result, the Defendant caused the victim C’s injury to the base and tension in light of the foregoing occupational negligence, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and the victim D suffered injury in light of the date of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Blue cinematographic photographs;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso of Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the defendant's responsibility for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code for the reason of sentencing of Article 62-2 of the order to attend a compliance driving lecture is important, the victim is the same as the previous one.