beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Around October 2009, the Defendant entered into a real estate sales contract with the victim E, F, and G to sell each purchase price of KRW 60 million at the victim E, F, and G respectively, at a certified judicial scrivener office in Seocho-gu Seoul, where the name in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government is unknown.
At the time, each of the above D's units of the building was the mortgagee of the right to collateral security, the creditor of the right to collateral security, the creditor of the right to collateral security, the maximum debt amount of KRW 130 million, and the joint collateral security established for the debtor as the defendant. On the other hand, the defendant was the sectional owner of Seocho-gu Seoul, and the president of the reconstruction association, the above H'
When the Defendant entered into a sales contract with the victims for the foregoing D Building B Nos. 501, 502, and 503, the Defendant: “The obligation set up in the copy of the said D Building as of the contract date shall be the seller’s responsibility; and the seller, in relation to the promotion of reconstruction under the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H Building B, shall cancel all the portions set up in the original copy of the said D Building (liability) if the PF funds of the Bank are left out of the PF funds of the Bank in relation to the promotion of reconstruction under the said H Building B. (To be cancelled by January 30, 2010, and if this period is delayed, the said period shall be returned to the victims) through I; and the terms and conditions as stated in the said Special Agreement
However, even if the PF funds were to be used as the construction cost of the reconstruction project while holding and managing an international trust company, which is the management trust company, even if the funds were to be used as the construction cost of the reconstruction project, the above funds were to be used. Thus, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to obtain a part of the above funds or to cancel all collateral security by repaying the collateral security obligations set forth in No. 501, 502, and 503 of the D building until January 30, 2010 as stated in the special agreement.
As above, the defendant deceivings the victims and belongs to them.