logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.01.12 2016고정989
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the residents of Seo-gu Daejeon apartment, and the victim D(61) is the representative director of the Dong Council of the above C apartment.

The Defendant, around 10:40 on May 3, 2016, on the ground that at the conference room for the representative of the occupants of the above C Apartments, the victim tried to enter into a contract with the apartment management entity against which he or she, including himself, for the reason that the victim sought to enter into the contract;

How much the company received and received the money.

“In addition, the Plaintiff 10,000 won of the market price was damaged by breaking the table table for the conference to be managed by the victim by drinking twice, and thereby obstructing the conclusion of the contract by force of the victim, such as destroying property equivalent to 80,000 won of the market price by destroying the table table for the conference (two meters in width, one meter in length, and one meter in length). At the same time, four persons, including the representative of the central management company, etc., engaged in the conclusion of the contract for apartment controlled entities, such as destroying sound, destroying the table table for the conference, and destroying it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Part of the police statements made in relation to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than the text of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which bears the costs of lawsuit;

arrow